Startup entity

Financial Times

Company

Financial Times is most often covered alongside Anthropic, which appears in 2 of these 6 stories. Negative sentiment reaches 17% here, compared with 19% across the 1831-story beat baseline for the same window. That works out to roughly 0.2 stories per week across a 211-day span. The busiest single day carried 2.

Last mentioned: 3d ago

Entity pulse

Recent coverage · Financial Times

↑
6 stories
7.3 avg impact
17% positive
17% negative

Coverage balance Balanced directional read. Positive and negative coverage are within 0 percentage points.

  • 17% positive
  • 67% neutral
  • 17% negative

Figures are computed live from our source-verified story record — see our methodology for how impact and sentiment are derived.

What the coverage shows about Financial Times

Financial Times is most often covered alongside Anthropic, which appears in 2 of these 6 stories. Negative sentiment reaches 17% here, compared with 19% across the 1831-story beat baseline for the same window. That works out to roughly 0.2 stories per week across a 211-day span. The busiest single day carried 2. Their average consequence score of 7.3 runs above the beat's 6.6 for that window. They are less corroborated than the beat average, carrying 2.7 original sources each against 2.8 for the same window. market-trends accounts for 3 of the 6 tracked stories, while 2 other categories carry the remainder. We currently track 6 Startup stories that mention Financial Times, published between February 18, 2026 and September 16, 2026.

Stories tracked
6
Per week
0.2
Negative
17%
Sources per story
2.7

Computed from the 6 stories linked to this entity, with beat comparisons drawn from all 1831 Startup stories published in the same date window. Shares are omitted below five stories and comparisons below a twenty-story baseline.

Coverage cohort

Appears alongside

Other entities that clear the same relevance threshold in stories also covering Financial Times. Shared-story counts are live from our verified record — not editorial picks.

Timeline

  1. Anthropic listing expected

    Anthropic is expected to complete its listing days before the U.S. midterm elections.

  2. Anthropic IPO marketing begins

    Anthropic is expected to begin marketing its IPO in mid-October at the earliest.

  3. FT reports $1.2T funding talks

    The Financial Times reported that OpenAI has held early-stage discussions with large investors about a raise at a roughly $1.2 trillion valuation.

  4. Altman rules out 2026 IPO

    Sam Altman said OpenAI would not go public in 2026, citing safety concerns over artificial intelligence.

  5. Third Consecutive Year

    Vinova is officially named to the 2026 list, completing a rare 'three-peat' of high-growth recognition.

  6. Market Analysis

    Financial Times characterizes the move as a 'sharp slide' as economists recalibrate 2026 forecasts.

  7. GSA Draft Leaked

    The Financial Times reports on draft GSA guidelines requiring 'any lawful use' clauses for civilian AI contracts.

  8. Initial Reporting

    BBC and other major outlets report the unexpected loss of 92,000 jobs.

  9. Supply-Chain Designation

    The Pentagon officially labels Anthropic a supply-chain risk, barring its use in military contracts.

  10. OpenAI closes $852B round

    OpenAI closed a funding round with $122 billion in committed capital, valuing the company at $852 billion.

  11. Data Collection

    Labor market surveys indicate a significant drop in payrolls across multiple sectors.

  12. Safeguard Dispute

    Anthropic and the Pentagon begin a months-long disagreement over AI safety protocols.

  13. Second Consecutive Year

    The company maintains its growth trajectory and is recognized for a second year.

  14. First FT Recognition

    Vinova enters the FT Top 500 High-Growth Companies APAC list for the first time.

Stories mentioning Financial Times 6

Financial Times is linked from 6 stories on this site, each scored at or above our 35% relevance threshold — see how these pages are built.

See something wrong on this page — a misattributed entity, a wrong stat, a broken source link? Report a data issue.