Stoxx 600 Hits Record as US Supreme Court Strikes Down Trump Tariffs

The intersection of US judicial intervention and global trade policy reached a fever pitch this week as the US Supreme Court delivered a sweeping rebuke of the Trump administration’s protectionist agenda. In a landmark 6-3 decision, the nation’s highest court ruled that the executive branch overstepped its constitutional authority by using national emergency laws to impose broad 'reciprocal' import duties. The court’s majority, which included several conservative justices, argued that the specific statutes cited by the White House did not grant the President the unilateral power to levy taxes—a function traditionally reserved for Congress. This legal pivot immediately sent shockwaves through global markets, with the STOXX Europe 600 hitting an all-time record high as investors priced in a reprieve for European exporters.

For European multinationals and US-based hardware startups alike, the ruling represents more than just a symbolic victory; it opens a pathway for potentially billions of dollars in tariff refunds. Many companies had been operating under compressed margins due to the 'reciprocal' duties, and the prospect of recovering those costs provides a significant tailwind for Q1 and Q2 earnings. The market rally in Europe specifically reflects the relief felt by the automotive, luxury goods, and industrial sectors, which have been most exposed to the transatlantic trade friction. However, the euphoria may be short-lived as the White House remains undeterred in its mission to reshape global trade dynamics through executive action.

“

President Trump’s immediate response to the ruling—lashing out at the justices and announcing a new 10% 'global tariff' under Section 122—underscores the volatility that continues to define the current regulatory environment.

President Trump’s immediate response to the ruling—lashing out at the justices and announcing a new 10% 'global tariff' under Section 122—underscores the volatility that continues to define the current regulatory environment. By pivoting to a different legal mechanism, the administration is effectively daring the judiciary to intervene again, setting the stage for a protracted 'cat-and-mouse' game between the executive and judicial branches. This 'Section 122' move is intended to layer on top of existing levies that were not affected by the Supreme Court’s specific ruling, suggesting that the net reduction in trade barriers may be less significant than the initial market reaction suggests.

From a venture capital and startup perspective, this ongoing trade war creates a bifurcated landscape. On one hand, the SCOTUS ruling reinforces the 'rules-based' trade system that provides the predictability necessary for long-term capital investment and global supply chain scaling. On the other hand, the administration’s rapid-fire executive orders mean that hardware and manufacturing startups must remain agile, maintaining 'tariff-neutral' supply chains even as legal victories are won. Investors are now closely watching how the refund process will be administered and whether Congress will step in to clarify the President’s emergency economic powers to prevent further market-destabilizing shifts.

Looking forward, the focus shifts to the inevitable legal challenges against the new 10% global levy. If the Supreme Court’s 6-3 split holds in future cases, it suggests a growing judicial skepticism toward the expansion of executive power in the economic sphere. For now, the record-breaking performance of the Stoxx 600 serves as a barometer for how much the global economy craves a return to traditional trade norms, even as the political reality in Washington remains firmly committed to disruption.