Trump Signs 10% Global Tariff via Section 122 After Supreme Court Setback

The landscape of international trade has shifted overnight as President Donald Trump signed a sweeping 10% global tariff on all imported goods. This move, announced via Truth Social from the Oval Office, represents a strategic pivot following a significant judicial defeat. Earlier this week, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6–3 that the administration had overstepped its authority by using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose broad levies. By invoking Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 instead, the administration is attempting to re-establish its protectionist agenda through a different statutory lens, albeit one with a ticking clock.

For the venture capital and startup ecosystem, this development introduces a period of acute price volatility. Unlike previous targeted tariffs, Section 122 requires that the duties be nondiscriminatory. This means that startups sourcing components from traditional allies or 'near-shoring' partners like Mexico or Canada will face the same 10% cost increase as those sourcing from elsewhere. For hardware startups already grappling with thin margins and high bills of materials (BOM), this 10% surcharge could necessitate immediate price hikes for consumers or a rapid search for domestic alternatives that may not yet exist at scale.

“

The landscape of international trade has shifted overnight as President Donald Trump signed a sweeping 10% global tariff on all imported goods.

Industry analysts suggest that the 'adjustment process' Trump mentioned will be painful for companies with just-in-time supply chains. The immediate nature of the implementation—expected to take effect within days—leaves little room for front-loading inventory. Furthermore, because Section 122 is limited to a 150-day duration without Congressional intervention, businesses are forced into a state of 'regulatory limbo.' They must decide whether to absorb the costs in hopes that Congress blocks an extension or to restructure their entire supply chain for a permanent high-tariff environment.

From a venture perspective, this may accelerate the 'American Dynamism' trend, where investors favor companies that build and source within the United States. However, the short-term impact on existing portfolios, particularly in consumer electronics, automotive tech, and renewable energy, could be severe. If retaliatory tariffs from trading partners follow, as is historically common, U.S.-based startups looking to expand into international markets will face a double-edged sword: higher costs for inputs and higher barriers for exports.

Looking ahead, the focus shifts to the halls of Congress and the offices of key economic advisors like Scott Bessent and Jamieson Greer. As the 150-day deadline approaches, the lobbying efforts from both tech giants and manufacturing coalitions will be unprecedented. Investors should watch for how the administration handles the 'nondiscriminatory' requirement, as any attempt to carve out exemptions for specific nations could trigger further legal challenges, potentially landing the administration back in front of a skeptical Supreme Court. For now, the era of low-cost global sourcing has hit a significant, and perhaps permanent, roadblock.