Funding Rounds Very Bullish 8

Expeditions' €197M defence fund to back 40 early-stage startups across Europe

· 4 min read ·
Share

Key Takeaways

  • For startup founders and VCs, the €197M Fund II from Expeditions signals a record capital pool for European defence tech.
  • Backed by BAE, NATO, and operator LPs from Skype, Wise, Bolt, and Snowflake, it targets dual-use technologies at the early stage.

Mentioned

Expeditions company BAE Systems company BAESY NATO Innovation Fund company Lakestar company Polish Development Fund company Dr Mikolaj Firlej person Stanislaw Kastory person Alpine Eagle company Comand AI company Nu Quantum company Labrys company

Key Intelligence

Key Facts

  1. 1Expeditions closed its second fund at €197 million ($225 million), exceeding the initial €150 million target.
  2. 2BAE Systems committed €25 million to Fund II as part of its €50 million Launchpad programme, which also includes a €25 million investment in Lakestar.
  3. 3The fund plans to invest in up to 40 early-stage companies across dual-use fields including cybersecurity, AI, autonomy, quantum, communications, and space.
  4. 4Expeditions claims it has backed nearly 30% of the 30 most well-funded defence startups in Europe, with Fund I investments including Alpine Eagle, Comand AI, Nu Quantum, and Labrys.
  5. 5LP base includes the NATO Innovation Fund, Polish Development Fund, and early executives from Skype, Wise, Bolt, and Snowflake.
  6. 6The firm was founded in 2021 by Dr Mikolaj Firlej and Stanislaw Kastory, focusing on security and deep tech at the intersection of defence and commercial.
Fund II Size
€197M +€47M above target

Oversubscribed fund with strong LP backing

Analysis

Bull Case
  • Record funding for European defence tech signals market maturation
  • Strong LP network provides access to government procurement and talent
  • Dual-use focus opens commercial exit paths beyond defence
Bear Case
  • Regulatory fragmentation across EU states complicates scaling
  • Ethical concerns around autonomous weapons may deter some LPs
  • Long sales cycles and capital-intensive R&D delay returns

Analysis

The European defence tech scene just got a massive shot of venture capital. Expeditions' new €197M fund, oversubscribed from a €150M target, is poised to write first checks into 40 early-stage startups, drawing on an LP base that includes not just defence prime BAE and the NATO Innovation Fund, but also early executives from Skype, Wise, Bolt, and Snowflake. For founders building at the intersection of security and deep tech—from AI and autonomy to quantum and space—this fund represents a new level of institutional validation and a runway to scale critical technologies.

Expeditions, the Warsaw-based venture firm, has closed its second fund at €197 million ($225 million), significantly overshooting its €150 million target. The fund, spearheaded by founders Dr Mikolaj Firlej and Stanislaw Kastory, is dedicated to early-stage European defence and dual-use startups, with a thesis built squarely on technological sovereignty. The close is emblematic of a tectonic shift in European venture capital, where defence tech—once a niche, ethically fraught corner—has become a magnet for institutional capital, driven by the war in Ukraine and a continent-wide scramble to close critical capability gaps. Backed by British defence prime BAE Systems and the NATO Innovation Fund, Fund II is not only a financial instrument but a geopolitical statement: Europe must develop and control its own military technologies rather than relying on imports.

Expeditions, the Warsaw-based venture firm, has closed its second fund at €197 million ($225 million), significantly overshooting its €150 million target.

The LP roster reads like a cross-section of European tech power. BAE itself committed €25 million to Fund II as part of its broader Launchpad programme, a €50 million initiative that also placed €25 million into Klaus Hommels’ Lakestar. The Launchpad is deliberately two-way, designed to spin out BAE’s lab-developed technologies into commercial startups while also backing outside founders who might bring fresh innovation to defence. Alongside BAE and NATO, anchor investors include Poland’s state-backed Polish Development Fund and a clutch of early executives from Skype, Wise, Bolt, and Snowflake—operators who bring deep scaling experience. This mix of defence industrial, sovereign, and operator LPs creates a unique support structure for portfolio companies, bridging the gap between government procurement and agile startup culture.

Expeditions frames its remit around 'immediate operational relevance to Europe's critical capability gaps.' The fund will deploy capital across up to 40 early-stage companies operating in cybersecurity, intelligence, autonomy, artificial intelligence, quantum computing, communications, and space. The firm has already established a formidable track record with Fund I, claiming to have backed nearly 30% of the 30 most well-funded defence startups in Europe. Portfolio names include Alpine Eagle (counter-drone systems), Comand AI (battlefield decision-making software), Nu Quantum (quantum networking), and Labrys (dual-use drone swarms). This concentration of deal flow signals that Expeditions has become a kingmaker in the nascent European defence tech ecosystem.

The fund close arrives amid a historic surge in defence tech investment on the continent. BAE’s €50 million Launchpad commitment is just one sign of primes actively engaging with the venture ecosystem. The market implications are profound: with more dedicated pools of smart money, the cycle from lab to deployment can compress dramatically, potentially altering the competitive landscape for traditional defence contractors. Moreover, the emphasis on dual-use technologies means that many of the startups backed could find commercial applications in sectors like logistics, telecommunications, and infrastructure, creating exit paths beyond government sales.

What to Watch

For Europe’s strategic autonomy, Expeditions Fund II represents a significant step. The continent has long relied on US and Israeli technology for critical defence systems, from drones to cyber tools. By fostering a homegrown pipeline of deep-tech startups, the fund aims to reduce that dependency. Yet challenges remain. Regulatory fragmentation across EU member states, ethical debates around autonomous weapons, and the inherent risk of investing in early-stage defence hardware—with long sales cycles and capital-intensive R&D—could temper returns. Still, the oversubscription and the calibre of LPs suggest that investors are willing to bet that the geopolitical imperative will translate into a durable asset class.

Looking ahead, Expeditions’ success could catalyse a wave of specialist defence funds across Europe, mirroring the US model where dedicated defence VCs like Andreessen Horowitz’s American Dynamism are proliferating. The deep integration of a prime contractor like BAE as both LP and technology partner may become a template for how traditional defence companies engage with the startup ecosystem. As the Fund II capital is deployed, the industry will watch closely whether venture-backed innovation can actually move the needle on Europe's defence capabilities—or whether the money merely fuels a speculative bubble in a sector that fundamentally requires government procurement to scale. In either case, July 2026 will be remembered as a pivotal moment when European defence tech officially came of age as an investable category.

Timeline

Timeline

  1. Expeditions founded

  2. Fund II close announced

How we covered this story

Every story in our startup coverage is assembled from multiple primary sources, cross-referenced for factual consistency, and scored along three independent dimensions: sentiment, operational impact, and source-cluster confidence. Single-source rumors and unverifiable claims do not pass our editorial gate. When a story shows "Verified by N sources" with N≥2, the development is independently corroborated; when N=1, we mark it explicitly so readers can weigh the signal accordingly.

Impact scoring uses a 1-10 scale weighted toward regulatory, financial, and operational consequence rather than coverage volume. A topic that runs in every outlet but moves no real decisions ranks lower than a niche regulatory filing that reshapes how operators in the startup space have to behave. Read our full methodology for the scoring rubric, our glossary for term definitions, and our trends index for the longitudinal view across the beat.